The Role of Warranties and Indemnities in Protecting Buyers in Acquisitions
When purchasing a business/shares, buyers want assurance that they will be getting what they pay...
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Until now, the general approach has been that a company cannot claim privilege against its own shareholder, so that a shareholder is entitled to see otherwise confidential company documents – such as legal correspondence. However, in the recent landmark decision of Aabar Holdings SARL v Glencore PLC & Ors [2024] EWHC 3046 (Comm), the English High Court has overturned the century-old "Shareholder Rule," marking a significant shift in the law.
Background
The "Shareholder Rule" originated in the 19th century, allowing shareholders to access a company's privileged legal advice. This principle was based on the notion that shareholders, as contributors to the company's capital, had a proprietary interest in a company’s assets. However, in recent times, this rule has been increasingly because of the principle that a shareholder and a company are distinct legal entities.
Aabar Holdings S.á.r.l. brought a claim against Glencore Plc and several individuals under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. The central issue was whether Glencore could assert privilege against its shareholders.
The court ruled that the "Shareholder Rule" is unjustifiable and should no longer be applied.
Practical takeaways
If you are a shareholder and are in a dispute with a director concerning the approach the company is taking and your right to see documents, please contact our corporate disputes specialists Morgan Rees and George Gwynn. We routinely act in all manner of corporate disputes.
Contact our offices
Make an enquiry