George Green LLP Welcomes Two New Family Solicitors to Sutton Coldfield Office
George Green LLP is thrilled to announce the expansion of its Family Law team with the...
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
The 2021 case of Fox Group International Limited (“Fox”) v Teleta Pharma Limited (“Teleta”) is an example of an intellectual property case backfiring.
Fox, a supplier of cosmetic products, had a distributor agreement with Across Co. Ltd (“Across”) for the distribution of a cosmetic product (“the Product”) in the UK. However, Across expressly retained the intellectual property rights in the product in the distribution agreement.
Despite this, Fox registered a UK trademark in the product seeking to exercise exclusive rights over the product. Fox shortly thereafter threatened and then issued infringement proceedings against Teleta for selling the product in the UK.
Teleta advanced a defence on the basis that it was selling legitimate Across products and that Fox’s UK trademark was invalid and in bad faith. Teleta also counterclaimed for damages for unjustified threats.
Fox argued that Across had consented to it having exclusive rights over the Product. However, Fox lacked persuasive evidence. Eventually, Fox discontinued its claim.
The counterclaim continued. At the hearing, the judge found that Fox had applied for the trademark in bad faith and had made unjustifiable threats, advising that the case was a ‘cautionary tale’ for those seeking to enforce their intellectual property rights.
What are the takeaways?
If you own and suspect infringement of your intellectual property rights, including trademarks, registered or unregistered design rights, copyright or patents, or you have been accused of infringing an intellectual property right, please contact our specialist team for urgent advice.
Contact our offices
Make an enquiry